Back to all

Electric vs. Liquid Nitrogen Cryotherapy: Choosing the Right Cold Therapy

electric cryotherapy a cutting-edge alternative

Cryotherapy, the use of extremely cold temperatures for therapeutic purposes, has garnered significant attention in both medical and wellness circles. Traditionally facilitated using liquid nitrogen, recent advancements have introduced electric cryotherapy as a cutting-edge alternative.

Understanding the Differences

Liquid Nitrogen Cryotherapy

This traditional form of cryotherapy involves releasing liquid nitrogen into a closed chamber, where it vaporizes into a cold gas used to cool the chamber air quickly. The temperatures can plummet to between -100°C and -150°C (-148°F to -238°F). The individual stands in this chamber, or cryosauna, with their head typically remaining outside, and exposure lasts for a couple of minutes. This rapid skin cooling is believed to stimulate various physiological reactions.

Electric cryotherapy chambers do not use liquid nitrogen. Instead, they rely on an electric cooling system to chill the air within the chamber. This method also allows for whole-body exposure to cold, but the key difference lies in the elimination of nitrogen gas, making it a breathable environment throughout the session. Temperatures in electric chambers are similar to those in nitrogen-cooled chambers and the cooling process is slightly more gradual, leading to a different user experience.

Comparing Benefits and Considerations


Safety is a significant consideration when comparing these two methods. Liquid nitrogen cryotherapy has come under scrutiny due to the potential risks associated with nitrogen gas inhalation, which can be dangerous if proper protocols are not followed. Conversely, electric cryotherapy is generally considered safer as it eliminates the risk of asphyxiation, making it a preferable option for those concerned with respiratory safety.


Both methods effectively reduce tissue temperature and elicit the body’s natural response to extreme cold, including reducing inflammation, releasing endorphins, and increasing metabolism. 

Environmental and Operational Concerns

From an operational standpoint, electric cryotherapy chambers are more sustainable as they do not require the continuous purchase and handling of liquid nitrogen, which can be costly and logistically challenging. Electric systems, once installed, use only electricity, which can be sourced from renewable energy, thus potentially reducing the environmental footprint.


Initial costs for both types of chambers can be high, but the ongoing operational costs of electric cryotherapy tend to be lower compared to liquid nitrogen chambers, which require regular nitrogen deliveries. This aspect makes electric cryotherapy potentially more accessible in the long run, especially for facilities expecting high usage rates.

Electric Cryo Chambers are the future

Choosing between electric and liquid nitrogen cryotherapy depends on several factors including safety preferences, budget, expected usage, and personal sensitivity to cold. Both methods offer effective treatment options within therapeutic, wellness, and athletic contexts, providing significant health benefits such as reduced inflammation, pain relief, and improved recovery times.

As with any therapeutic treatment, potential users should consult healthcare professionals before initiating sessions, particularly those with conditions that may contraindicate extreme cold exposure.